INSA CGST (Inspectors, Supdts and ACs from CGST)

The group with Mr. Ravi Malik as it's advisor, or chief advisor had been claiming that they were the original association and that the Association leadership that took over from Chennai 2017 Convention and has been running as AIASCT was a splinter group and that it was a divisive force. Now, it is learnt that the information obtained under RTI by Shri. Kousik Roy, has thoroughly exposed them and has shown for all those who care to see that they have claimed hardly 16.27% membership strength with 2531 Superintendents and only 35 ACs.  Out of that, in the verification conducted by the department only the following number is proved: 1.      Ahmedabad - 336 2.      Vadodara - 410 3.      Guwahati - 258 4.      Kolkata - 131 5.      Lucknow - 101 6.      Mumbai - 226 7.      Vizag - 150. The total of the above comes only to 1612.  Which falls short of even the 15% mark. Yet, they have been accorded recognition by the CBIC in their wisdom. In contrast to the above, AIASCT had submitted D

What next, after the Judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Calcutta in the matter of 1.1.96? -R. Manimohan Many individuals, who are retired as well as serving and some Office Bearers of Associations have contacted me regarding what is to be done in the matter of re-fixation of pay scales of Inspectors,  Superintendents, ITOs, and equivalent cadres in the CBIC and CBDT with effect from 1.1.96 consequent to the Hon'ble High Court judgment  of Calcutta. Some of them have contacted me since I have been associated with this issue ever since 1994, when Com. Rahate and Com. Rudra Mani Mishra of Indore Inspectors' Association had approached the Jabalpur CAT and I was one of those who collected some amount for fighting the case when the then SG of the Inspectors" Federation Com. R.C. Sharma was said to be not helping them.  Later Com. R.C.Sharma also joined in.  Later I was associated with the programmes of the COC of Revenue in 1998 and was later instrumental in reviving it i

A Whatsapp message is under circulation as below: “DPC : During informal meeting with Office Bearers of AIASCT at Bengaluru during this week, Chairman and Member ( P & A) spelt out their mind that, they are determined to complete the DPC exercise on a fast track basis. They are fully cognisant of the regional disparities within C Ex Cadre and also disparity with Customs Officers. However, now is not the time to rectify all these legacy errors. Time will solve them. Task on hand is to complete the DPC before end of October. Let's all hope for a Mega Deepavali Gift.” The message does not indicate the person or from which source it is gathered. However, the glee with which it announces that nothing would be done now and a Deepavgali Gift could be expected would enable one to guess the source of the message. In the previous blog PRESS HERE FOR THE BLOG  I had outlined the reason for a momentous decision of the CEC of the AIASCT remaining un-executed. Some persons who went through

          The cadres of Inspectors and Superintendents have lost another historic opportunity this August.      When the Draft All India Seniority List was issued by the CBIC, as anticipated, it evidenced the gapping zonal inequalities. I had circulated the message below, to the cadre: "THE MIRROR OF MISMANAGEMENT AND DISCRIMINATION ' At long last, the CBIC issued the draft All India Seniority list for Superintendents of Central Excise and CGST with effect from 1.1.2007 to 31.12.2011 on 28.07.2022. As anticipated, the Board has not carried out any of the Court judgments in respect of fixation of inter-se seniority in rem. Hence, the injustice for the cadre continues to be perpetuated, in the name of an RR which is grossly unconstitutional for the reasons we will be seeing in the coming paras. The NR Parmar judgment of the Apex Court which was to be implemented in all zones without discrimination as per the judgment of the Madras High Court judgment in P. Bharathan case has not

    In the earlier blog, I had left it open to analyse where we went wrong, leading to the miserable plight of the cadre. One opinion that came in reply from a member was ‘lack of unity’.   It is indeed a reason.   But when we analyse the history of any society or nations or for that matter other organisations in the Central Government itself, nowhere we will be able to see a case of 100% unity.   It is not possible.   There will always be vested interests.   Even in the greatest of freedom struggles, including a very vast many Indians, it could be seen that it was not a 100% unity that brought success.   There were elements inimical to the movement, within and without, there were supporters of the British Raj, among our own elite, there were different shades of opinions regarding how the movement should be taken forward, whether right, left or centre, there were pressure groups having their own grouse against the majority movement, and in spite of all that, if the movement could

  Last week in a retirement party, one of our former Association Office Bearers, Com. N.S. Rajagopal had openly expressed his frustration over the stagnation, as the reason for his opting for VRS, two years before he was due to retire.   His speech went viral.   It is reproduced for the benefit of those who have not yet come across the same.   VRS Speech by Com. N.S. Rajagopal What of course he did not say was that, while he joined the department with great hopes, he had already learnt COBOL language and was working as a Computer Programmer for two years at Bangalore.   That was in 1988.   One could very well imagine to what heights he could have gone, if he had continued in the same field – because in 1988 a Computer programmer with Cobalt knowledge would not have been just another person.   I know him personally.   In respect of religious belief or concept of God, he is a non-believer.   Yet, in the course of his speech, he said that the only ‘sin’ he committed was to tick th